5th Workshop - Versionsgeschichte

Annette Klosa: /* Topic: Research into dictionary use and user-adaptive access (25th/26th March 2013, Instituut voor Nederlandse Lexicologie, Leiden) */

2014-07-24T12:12:03Z

Topic: Research into dictionary use and user-adaptive access (25th/26th March 2013, Instituut voor Nederlandse Lexicologie, Leiden)

← Nächstältere Version		Version vom 24. Juli 2014, 12:12 Uhr
Zeile 3:		Zeile 3:
	== Topic: Research into dictionary use and user-adaptive access (25th/26th March 2013, Instituut voor Nederlandse Lexicologie, Leiden)==		== Topic: Research into dictionary use and user-adaptive access (25th/26th March 2013, Instituut voor Nederlandse Lexicologie, Leiden)==

	'''[[media:Programm_5_Arbeitstreffen_final.pdf\|(Agenda,]] [[media:Preprint-V1.pdf\|Preprint publication on the 5th workshop]]'''		'''[[media:Programm_5_Arbeitstreffen_final.pdf\|(Agenda,]] [[media:Preprint-V1.pdf\|Preprint publication on the 5th workshop)]]'''

	[[(Robert Lew "Opportunities and limitations of user studies")]], [[(Serge Verlinde "Do dictionary users need dictionaries?")]], [[(Carolin Müller-Spitzer "Empirische Daten über Benutzungskontexte bzw. extra-lexikografische Situationen")]], [[(Sven Tarp "The poverty of Lexicography")]], [[(Karin Rautmann "Duden online: Die Nutzer im Fokus")]], [[(short presentation Alexander Geyken "Methode der Logfileanalyse"]]), [[(short presentation Carolin Müller-Spitzer "Methode des Eye Tracking"]]), [[media:Online_Questionnaires_Klosa.pdf\| (short presentation Annette Klosa "Methode der Onlinebefragung"]]), [[(short presentation Carolin Müller-Spitzer "Wissen der Lexikografen über die Wörterbuchbenutzer")]], [[media:Impulsreferat_Users and Dictionaries.pdf\| (short presentation tanneke Schoonheim/Carole Tiberius "Wissen der Wörterbuchbenutzer über das Wörterbuch")]], [[media:Impulsreferat_Consequences_Klosa.pdf\| (short presentation Annette Klosa "Wörterbuchbenutzungsforschung und lexikografischer Prozess")]]		[[(Robert Lew "Opportunities and limitations of user studies")]], [[(Serge Verlinde "Do dictionary users need dictionaries?")]], [[(Carolin Müller-Spitzer "Empirische Daten über Benutzungskontexte bzw. extra-lexikografische Situationen")]], [[(Sven Tarp "The poverty of Lexicography")]], [[(Karin Rautmann "Duden online: Die Nutzer im Fokus")]], [[(short presentation Alexander Geyken "Methode der Logfileanalyse"]]), [[(short presentation Carolin Müller-Spitzer "Methode des Eye Tracking"]]), [[media:Online_Questionnaires_Klosa.pdf\| (short presentation Annette Klosa "Methode der Onlinebefragung"]]), [[(short presentation Carolin Müller-Spitzer "Wissen der Lexikografen über die Wörterbuchbenutzer")]], [[media:Impulsreferat_Users and Dictionaries.pdf\| (short presentation tanneke Schoonheim/Carole Tiberius "Wissen der Wörterbuchbenutzer über das Wörterbuch")]], [[media:Impulsreferat_Consequences_Klosa.pdf\| (short presentation Annette Klosa "Wörterbuchbenutzungsforschung und lexikografischer Prozess")]]

Annette Klosa: /* Topic: Research into dictionary use and user-adaptive access (25th/26th March 2013, Instituut voor Nederlandse Lexicologie, Leiden) */

2014-07-24T12:11:20Z

Topic: Research into dictionary use and user-adaptive access (25th/26th March 2013, Instituut voor Nederlandse Lexicologie, Leiden)

← Nächstältere Version		Version vom 24. Juli 2014, 12:11 Uhr
Zeile 3:		Zeile 3:
	== Topic: Research into dictionary use and user-adaptive access (25th/26th March 2013, Instituut voor Nederlandse Lexicologie, Leiden)==		== Topic: Research into dictionary use and user-adaptive access (25th/26th March 2013, Instituut voor Nederlandse Lexicologie, Leiden)==

	'''[[media:Programm_5_Arbeitstreffen_final.pdf\|(Agenda,]] [[media:Preprint-V1.pdf\|Preprint publication on the ~~meeting~~]]'''		'''[[media:Programm_5_Arbeitstreffen_final.pdf\|(Agenda,]] [[media:Preprint-V1.pdf\|Preprint publication on the 5th workshop]]'''

	[[(Robert Lew "Opportunities and limitations of user studies")]], [[(Serge Verlinde "Do dictionary users need dictionaries?")]], [[(Carolin Müller-Spitzer "Empirische Daten über Benutzungskontexte bzw. extra-lexikografische Situationen")]], [[(Sven Tarp "The poverty of Lexicography")]], [[(Karin Rautmann "Duden online: Die Nutzer im Fokus")]], [[(short presentation Alexander Geyken "Methode der Logfileanalyse"]]), [[(short presentation Carolin Müller-Spitzer "Methode des Eye Tracking"]]), [[media:Online_Questionnaires_Klosa.pdf\| (short presentation Annette Klosa "Methode der Onlinebefragung"]]), [[(short presentation Carolin Müller-Spitzer "Wissen der Lexikografen über die Wörterbuchbenutzer")]], [[media:Impulsreferat_Users and Dictionaries.pdf\| (short presentation tanneke Schoonheim/Carole Tiberius "Wissen der Wörterbuchbenutzer über das Wörterbuch")]], [[media:Impulsreferat_Consequences_Klosa.pdf\| (short presentation Annette Klosa "Wörterbuchbenutzungsforschung und lexikografischer Prozess")]]		[[(Robert Lew "Opportunities and limitations of user studies")]], [[(Serge Verlinde "Do dictionary users need dictionaries?")]], [[(Carolin Müller-Spitzer "Empirische Daten über Benutzungskontexte bzw. extra-lexikografische Situationen")]], [[(Sven Tarp "The poverty of Lexicography")]], [[(Karin Rautmann "Duden online: Die Nutzer im Fokus")]], [[(short presentation Alexander Geyken "Methode der Logfileanalyse"]]), [[(short presentation Carolin Müller-Spitzer "Methode des Eye Tracking"]]), [[media:Online_Questionnaires_Klosa.pdf\| (short presentation Annette Klosa "Methode der Onlinebefragung"]]), [[(short presentation Carolin Müller-Spitzer "Wissen der Lexikografen über die Wörterbuchbenutzer")]], [[media:Impulsreferat_Users and Dictionaries.pdf\| (short presentation tanneke Schoonheim/Carole Tiberius "Wissen der Wörterbuchbenutzer über das Wörterbuch")]], [[media:Impulsreferat_Consequences_Klosa.pdf\| (short presentation Annette Klosa "Wörterbuchbenutzungsforschung und lexikografischer Prozess")]]

Annette Klosa: /* Topic: Research into dictionary use and user-adaptive access (25th/26th March 2013, Instituut voor Nederlandse Lexicologie, Leiden) */

2014-07-24T12:10:44Z

Topic: Research into dictionary use and user-adaptive access (25th/26th March 2013, Instituut voor Nederlandse Lexicologie, Leiden)

← Nächstältere Version		Version vom 24. Juli 2014, 12:10 Uhr
Zeile 3:		Zeile 3:
	== Topic: Research into dictionary use and user-adaptive access (25th/26th March 2013, Instituut voor Nederlandse Lexicologie, Leiden)==		== Topic: Research into dictionary use and user-adaptive access (25th/26th March 2013, Instituut voor Nederlandse Lexicologie, Leiden)==

	'''[[media:Programm_5_Arbeitstreffen_final.pdf\|(Agenda,]] [[media:Preprint-V1.pdf\|Preprint ~~des 5. Arbeitsberichtes~~]]'''		'''[[media:Programm_5_Arbeitstreffen_final.pdf\|(Agenda,]] [[media:Preprint-V1.pdf\|Preprint publication on the meeting]]'''

	[[(Robert Lew "Opportunities and limitations of user studies")]], [[(Serge Verlinde "Do dictionary users need dictionaries?")]], [[(Carolin Müller-Spitzer "Empirische Daten über Benutzungskontexte bzw. extra-lexikografische Situationen")]], [[(Sven Tarp "The poverty of Lexicography")]], [[(Karin Rautmann "Duden online: Die Nutzer im Fokus")]], [[(short presentation Alexander Geyken "Methode der Logfileanalyse"]]), [[(short presentation Carolin Müller-Spitzer "Methode des Eye Tracking"]]), [[media:Online_Questionnaires_Klosa.pdf\| (short presentation Annette Klosa "Methode der Onlinebefragung"]]), [[(short presentation Carolin Müller-Spitzer "Wissen der Lexikografen über die Wörterbuchbenutzer")]], [[media:Impulsreferat_Users and Dictionaries.pdf\| (short presentation tanneke Schoonheim/Carole Tiberius "Wissen der Wörterbuchbenutzer über das Wörterbuch")]], [[media:Impulsreferat_Consequences_Klosa.pdf\| (short presentation Annette Klosa "Wörterbuchbenutzungsforschung und lexikografischer Prozess")]]		[[(Robert Lew "Opportunities and limitations of user studies")]], [[(Serge Verlinde "Do dictionary users need dictionaries?")]], [[(Carolin Müller-Spitzer "Empirische Daten über Benutzungskontexte bzw. extra-lexikografische Situationen")]], [[(Sven Tarp "The poverty of Lexicography")]], [[(Karin Rautmann "Duden online: Die Nutzer im Fokus")]], [[(short presentation Alexander Geyken "Methode der Logfileanalyse"]]), [[(short presentation Carolin Müller-Spitzer "Methode des Eye Tracking"]]), [[media:Online_Questionnaires_Klosa.pdf\| (short presentation Annette Klosa "Methode der Onlinebefragung"]]), [[(short presentation Carolin Müller-Spitzer "Wissen der Lexikografen über die Wörterbuchbenutzer")]], [[media:Impulsreferat_Users and Dictionaries.pdf\| (short presentation tanneke Schoonheim/Carole Tiberius "Wissen der Wörterbuchbenutzer über das Wörterbuch")]], [[media:Impulsreferat_Consequences_Klosa.pdf\| (short presentation Annette Klosa "Wörterbuchbenutzungsforschung und lexikografischer Prozess")]]

Annette Klosa: /* Topic: Research into dictionary use and user-adaptive access (25th/26th March 2013, Instituut voor Nederlandse Lexicologie, Leiden) */

2014-07-24T12:10:15Z

Topic: Research into dictionary use and user-adaptive access (25th/26th March 2013, Instituut voor Nederlandse Lexicologie, Leiden)

← Nächstältere Version		Version vom 24. Juli 2014, 12:10 Uhr
Zeile 3:		Zeile 3:
	== Topic: Research into dictionary use and user-adaptive access (25th/26th March 2013, Instituut voor Nederlandse Lexicologie, Leiden)==		== Topic: Research into dictionary use and user-adaptive access (25th/26th March 2013, Instituut voor Nederlandse Lexicologie, Leiden)==

	'''[[media:Programm_5_Arbeitstreffen_final.pdf\|(Agenda)]]'''		'''[[media:Programm_5_Arbeitstreffen_final.pdf\|(Agenda,]] [[media:Preprint-V1.pdf\|Preprint des 5. Arbeitsberichtes]]'''

	[[(Robert Lew "Opportunities and limitations of user studies")]], [[(Serge Verlinde "Do dictionary users need dictionaries?")]], [[(Carolin Müller-Spitzer "Empirische Daten über Benutzungskontexte bzw. extra-lexikografische Situationen")]], [[(Sven Tarp "The poverty of Lexicography")]], [[(Karin Rautmann "Duden online: Die Nutzer im Fokus")]], [[(short presentation Alexander Geyken "Methode der Logfileanalyse"]]), [[(short presentation Carolin Müller-Spitzer "Methode des Eye Tracking"]]), [[media:Online_Questionnaires_Klosa.pdf\| (short presentation Annette Klosa "Methode der Onlinebefragung"]]), [[(short presentation Carolin Müller-Spitzer "Wissen der Lexikografen über die Wörterbuchbenutzer")]], [[media:Impulsreferat_Users and Dictionaries.pdf\| (short presentation tanneke Schoonheim/Carole Tiberius "Wissen der Wörterbuchbenutzer über das Wörterbuch")]], [[media:Impulsreferat_Consequences_Klosa.pdf\| (short presentation Annette Klosa "Wörterbuchbenutzungsforschung und lexikografischer Prozess")]]		[[(Robert Lew "Opportunities and limitations of user studies")]], [[(Serge Verlinde "Do dictionary users need dictionaries?")]], [[(Carolin Müller-Spitzer "Empirische Daten über Benutzungskontexte bzw. extra-lexikografische Situationen")]], [[(Sven Tarp "The poverty of Lexicography")]], [[(Karin Rautmann "Duden online: Die Nutzer im Fokus")]], [[(short presentation Alexander Geyken "Methode der Logfileanalyse"]]), [[(short presentation Carolin Müller-Spitzer "Methode des Eye Tracking"]]), [[media:Online_Questionnaires_Klosa.pdf\| (short presentation Annette Klosa "Methode der Onlinebefragung"]]), [[(short presentation Carolin Müller-Spitzer "Wissen der Lexikografen über die Wörterbuchbenutzer")]], [[media:Impulsreferat_Users and Dictionaries.pdf\| (short presentation tanneke Schoonheim/Carole Tiberius "Wissen der Wörterbuchbenutzer über das Wörterbuch")]], [[media:Impulsreferat_Consequences_Klosa.pdf\| (short presentation Annette Klosa "Wörterbuchbenutzungsforschung und lexikografischer Prozess")]]

Annette Klosa: /* Topic: Research into dictionary use and user-adaptive access (25th/26th March 2013, Instituut voor Nederlandse Lexicologie, Leiden) */

2013-12-03T11:19:35Z

Topic: Research into dictionary use and user-adaptive access (25th/26th March 2013, Instituut voor Nederlandse Lexicologie, Leiden)

← Nächstältere Version		Version vom 3. Dezember 2013, 11:19 Uhr
Zeile 5:		Zeile 5:
	'''[[media:Programm_5_Arbeitstreffen_final.pdf\|(Agenda)]]'''		'''[[media:Programm_5_Arbeitstreffen_final.pdf\|(Agenda)]]'''

	[[(Robert Lew "Opportunities and limitations of user studies")]], [[(Serge Verlinde "Do dictionary users need dictionaries?")]], [[(Carolin Müller-Spitzer "Empirische Daten über Benutzungskontexte bzw. extra-lexikografische Situationen")]], [[(Sven Tarp "The poverty of Lexicography")]], [[(Karin Rautmann "Duden online: Die Nutzer im Fokus")]], [[(short presentation "Methode der Logfileanalyse"]]), [[(short presentation "Methode des Eye Tracking"]]), [[media:Online_Questionnaires_Klosa.pdf\| (short presentation "Methode der Onlinebefragung"]]), [[(short presentation "Wissen der Lexikografen über die Wörterbuchbenutzer")]], [[media:Impulsreferat_Users and Dictionaries.pdf\| (short presentation "Wissen der Wörterbuchbenutzer über das Wörterbuch")]], [[media:Impulsreferat_Consequences_Klosa.pdf\| (short presentation "Wörterbuchbenutzungsforschung und lexikografischer Prozess")]]		[[(Robert Lew "Opportunities and limitations of user studies")]], [[(Serge Verlinde "Do dictionary users need dictionaries?")]], [[(Carolin Müller-Spitzer "Empirische Daten über Benutzungskontexte bzw. extra-lexikografische Situationen")]], [[(Sven Tarp "The poverty of Lexicography")]], [[(Karin Rautmann "Duden online: Die Nutzer im Fokus")]], [[(short presentation Alexander Geyken "Methode der Logfileanalyse"]]), [[(short presentation Carolin Müller-Spitzer "Methode des Eye Tracking"]]), [[media:Online_Questionnaires_Klosa.pdf\| (short presentation Annette Klosa "Methode der Onlinebefragung"]]), [[(short presentation Carolin Müller-Spitzer "Wissen der Lexikografen über die Wörterbuchbenutzer")]], [[media:Impulsreferat_Users and Dictionaries.pdf\| (short presentation tanneke Schoonheim/Carole Tiberius "Wissen der Wörterbuchbenutzer über das Wörterbuch")]], [[media:Impulsreferat_Consequences_Klosa.pdf\| (short presentation Annette Klosa "Wörterbuchbenutzungsforschung und lexikografischer Prozess")]]

	In the field of traditional print lexicography, it has been claimed time and again that a dictionary must be designed for particular user groups and usage situations (Bergenholtz / Nielsen / Tarp 2009, Wiegand 2001), which is reflected for example in the choice of headwords or lexicographical description. In online dictionaries, the issue of the conceptional integration of user orientation arises in a new way: to what extent can users be defined solely by what they are looking up in the dictionary on a specific occasion? How can a non-user-specific lexicographical resource be used to create access which is adaptable to what the user needs to look up at a specific moment (Müller-Spitzer 2008)? What are the limits of this user-independent and function-independent way of developing a dictionary?		In the field of traditional print lexicography, it has been claimed time and again that a dictionary must be designed for particular user groups and usage situations (Bergenholtz / Nielsen / Tarp 2009, Wiegand 2001), which is reflected for example in the choice of headwords or lexicographical description. In online dictionaries, the issue of the conceptional integration of user orientation arises in a new way: to what extent can users be defined solely by what they are looking up in the dictionary on a specific occasion? How can a non-user-specific lexicographical resource be used to create access which is adaptable to what the user needs to look up at a specific moment (Müller-Spitzer 2008)? What are the limits of this user-independent and function-independent way of developing a dictionary?

Annette Klosa: /* Topic: Research into dictionary use and user-adaptive access (25th/26th March 2013, Instituut voor Nederlandse Lexicologie, Leiden) */

2013-07-16T13:46:16Z

Topic: Research into dictionary use and user-adaptive access (25th/26th March 2013, Instituut voor Nederlandse Lexicologie, Leiden)

← Nächstältere Version		Version vom 16. Juli 2013, 13:46 Uhr
Zeile 5:		Zeile 5:
	'''[[media:Programm_5_Arbeitstreffen_final.pdf\|(Agenda)]]'''		'''[[media:Programm_5_Arbeitstreffen_final.pdf\|(Agenda)]]'''

	[[(Robert Lew "Opportunities and limitations of user studies")]], [[(Serge Verlinde "Do dictionary users need dictionaries?")]], [[(Carolin Müller-Spitzer "Empirische Daten über Benutzungskontexte bzw. extra-lexikografische Situationen")]], [[(Sven Tarp "The poverty of Lexicography")]], [[(Karin Rautmann "Duden online: Die Nutzer im Fokus")]], [[(short presentation "Methode der Logfileanalyse"]]), [[(short presentation "Methode des Eye Tracking"]]), [[media:Online_Questionnaires_Klosa.pdf\| (short presentation "Methode der Onlinebefragung"]]), [[(~~Impulsreferat~~ Wissen der Lexikografen über die Wörterbuchbenutzer)]], [[media:Impulsreferat_Users and Dictionaries.pdf\| (~~Impulsreferat~~ "Wissen der Wörterbuchbenutzer über das Wörterbuch")]], [[media:Impulsreferat_Consequences_Klosa.pdf\| ("Wörterbuchbenutzungsforschung und lexikografischer Prozess")]]		[[(Robert Lew "Opportunities and limitations of user studies")]], [[(Serge Verlinde "Do dictionary users need dictionaries?")]], [[(Carolin Müller-Spitzer "Empirische Daten über Benutzungskontexte bzw. extra-lexikografische Situationen")]], [[(Sven Tarp "The poverty of Lexicography")]], [[(Karin Rautmann "Duden online: Die Nutzer im Fokus")]], [[(short presentation "Methode der Logfileanalyse"]]), [[(short presentation "Methode des Eye Tracking"]]), [[media:Online_Questionnaires_Klosa.pdf\| (short presentation "Methode der Onlinebefragung"]]), [[(short presentation "Wissen der Lexikografen über die Wörterbuchbenutzer")]], [[media:Impulsreferat_Users and Dictionaries.pdf\| (short presentation "Wissen der Wörterbuchbenutzer über das Wörterbuch")]], [[media:Impulsreferat_Consequences_Klosa.pdf\| (short presentation "Wörterbuchbenutzungsforschung und lexikografischer Prozess")]]

	In the field of traditional print lexicography, it has been claimed time and again that a dictionary must be designed for particular user groups and usage situations (Bergenholtz / Nielsen / Tarp 2009, Wiegand 2001), which is reflected for example in the choice of headwords or lexicographical description. In online dictionaries, the issue of the conceptional integration of user orientation arises in a new way: to what extent can users be defined solely by what they are looking up in the dictionary on a specific occasion? How can a non-user-specific lexicographical resource be used to create access which is adaptable to what the user needs to look up at a specific moment (Müller-Spitzer 2008)? What are the limits of this user-independent and function-independent way of developing a dictionary?		In the field of traditional print lexicography, it has been claimed time and again that a dictionary must be designed for particular user groups and usage situations (Bergenholtz / Nielsen / Tarp 2009, Wiegand 2001), which is reflected for example in the choice of headwords or lexicographical description. In online dictionaries, the issue of the conceptional integration of user orientation arises in a new way: to what extent can users be defined solely by what they are looking up in the dictionary on a specific occasion? How can a non-user-specific lexicographical resource be used to create access which is adaptable to what the user needs to look up at a specific moment (Müller-Spitzer 2008)? What are the limits of this user-independent and function-independent way of developing a dictionary?

Annette Klosa: /* Topic: Research into dictionary use and user-adaptive access (25th/26th March 2013, Instituut voor Nederlandse Lexicologie, Leiden) */

2013-07-16T13:45:03Z

Topic: Research into dictionary use and user-adaptive access (25th/26th March 2013, Instituut voor Nederlandse Lexicologie, Leiden)

← Nächstältere Version		Version vom 16. Juli 2013, 13:45 Uhr
Zeile 4:		Zeile 4:

	'''[[media:Programm_5_Arbeitstreffen_final.pdf\|(Agenda)]]'''		'''[[media:Programm_5_Arbeitstreffen_final.pdf\|(Agenda)]]'''

			[[(Robert Lew "Opportunities and limitations of user studies")]], [[(Serge Verlinde "Do dictionary users need dictionaries?")]], [[(Carolin Müller-Spitzer "Empirische Daten über Benutzungskontexte bzw. extra-lexikografische Situationen")]], [[(Sven Tarp "The poverty of Lexicography")]], [[(Karin Rautmann "Duden online: Die Nutzer im Fokus")]], [[(short presentation "Methode der Logfileanalyse"]]), [[(short presentation "Methode des Eye Tracking"]]), [[media:Online_Questionnaires_Klosa.pdf\| (short presentation "Methode der Onlinebefragung"]]), [[(Impulsreferat Wissen der Lexikografen über die Wörterbuchbenutzer)]], [[media:Impulsreferat_Users and Dictionaries.pdf\| (Impulsreferat "Wissen der Wörterbuchbenutzer über das Wörterbuch")]], [[media:Impulsreferat_Consequences_Klosa.pdf\| ("Wörterbuchbenutzungsforschung und lexikografischer Prozess")]]

	In the field of traditional print lexicography, it has been claimed time and again that a dictionary must be designed for particular user groups and usage situations (Bergenholtz / Nielsen / Tarp 2009, Wiegand 2001), which is reflected for example in the choice of headwords or lexicographical description. In online dictionaries, the issue of the conceptional integration of user orientation arises in a new way: to what extent can users be defined solely by what they are looking up in the dictionary on a specific occasion? How can a non-user-specific lexicographical resource be used to create access which is adaptable to what the user needs to look up at a specific moment (Müller-Spitzer 2008)? What are the limits of this user-independent and function-independent way of developing a dictionary?		In the field of traditional print lexicography, it has been claimed time and again that a dictionary must be designed for particular user groups and usage situations (Bergenholtz / Nielsen / Tarp 2009, Wiegand 2001), which is reflected for example in the choice of headwords or lexicographical description. In online dictionaries, the issue of the conceptional integration of user orientation arises in a new way: to what extent can users be defined solely by what they are looking up in the dictionary on a specific occasion? How can a non-user-specific lexicographical resource be used to create access which is adaptable to what the user needs to look up at a specific moment (Müller-Spitzer 2008)? What are the limits of this user-independent and function-independent way of developing a dictionary?

Annette Klosa: /* Topic: Research into dictionary use and user-adaptive access (25th/26th March 2013, Instituut voor Nederlandse Lexicologie, Leiden) */

2013-03-06T14:16:37Z

Topic: Research into dictionary use and user-adaptive access (25th/26th March 2013, Instituut voor Nederlandse Lexicologie, Leiden)

← Nächstältere Version		Version vom 6. März 2013, 14:16 Uhr
Zeile 3:		Zeile 3:
	== Topic: Research into dictionary use and user-adaptive access (25th/26th March 2013, Instituut voor Nederlandse Lexicologie, Leiden)==		== Topic: Research into dictionary use and user-adaptive access (25th/26th March 2013, Instituut voor Nederlandse Lexicologie, Leiden)==

	'''[[media:Programm_5_Arbeitstreffen_final.pdf\|(~~agenda~~)]]'''		'''[[media:Programm_5_Arbeitstreffen_final.pdf\|(Agenda)]]'''

	In the field of traditional print lexicography, it has been claimed time and again that a dictionary must be designed for particular user groups and usage situations (Bergenholtz / Nielsen / Tarp 2009, Wiegand 2001), which is reflected for example in the choice of headwords or lexicographical description. In online dictionaries, the issue of the conceptional integration of user orientation arises in a new way: to what extent can users be defined solely by what they are looking up in the dictionary on a specific occasion? How can a non-user-specific lexicographical resource be used to create access which is adaptable to what the user needs to look up at a specific moment (Müller-Spitzer 2008)? What are the limits of this user-independent and function-independent way of developing a dictionary?		In the field of traditional print lexicography, it has been claimed time and again that a dictionary must be designed for particular user groups and usage situations (Bergenholtz / Nielsen / Tarp 2009, Wiegand 2001), which is reflected for example in the choice of headwords or lexicographical description. In online dictionaries, the issue of the conceptional integration of user orientation arises in a new way: to what extent can users be defined solely by what they are looking up in the dictionary on a specific occasion? How can a non-user-specific lexicographical resource be used to create access which is adaptable to what the user needs to look up at a specific moment (Müller-Spitzer 2008)? What are the limits of this user-independent and function-independent way of developing a dictionary?

Annette Klosa: /* Topic: Research into dictionary use and user-adaptive access (25th/26th March 2013, Instituut voor Nederlandse Lexicologie, Leiden) */

2013-03-06T14:16:14Z

Topic: Research into dictionary use and user-adaptive access (25th/26th March 2013, Instituut voor Nederlandse Lexicologie, Leiden)

← Nächstältere Version		Version vom 6. März 2013, 14:16 Uhr
Zeile 2:		Zeile 2:

	== Topic: Research into dictionary use and user-adaptive access (25th/26th March 2013, Instituut voor Nederlandse Lexicologie, Leiden)==		== Topic: Research into dictionary use and user-adaptive access (25th/26th March 2013, Instituut voor Nederlandse Lexicologie, Leiden)==

			'''[[media:Programm_5_Arbeitstreffen_final.pdf\|(agenda)]]'''

	In the field of traditional print lexicography, it has been claimed time and again that a dictionary must be designed for particular user groups and usage situations (Bergenholtz / Nielsen / Tarp 2009, Wiegand 2001), which is reflected for example in the choice of headwords or lexicographical description. In online dictionaries, the issue of the conceptional integration of user orientation arises in a new way: to what extent can users be defined solely by what they are looking up in the dictionary on a specific occasion? How can a non-user-specific lexicographical resource be used to create access which is adaptable to what the user needs to look up at a specific moment (Müller-Spitzer 2008)? What are the limits of this user-independent and function-independent way of developing a dictionary?		In the field of traditional print lexicography, it has been claimed time and again that a dictionary must be designed for particular user groups and usage situations (Bergenholtz / Nielsen / Tarp 2009, Wiegand 2001), which is reflected for example in the choice of headwords or lexicographical description. In online dictionaries, the issue of the conceptional integration of user orientation arises in a new way: to what extent can users be defined solely by what they are looking up in the dictionary on a specific occasion? How can a non-user-specific lexicographical resource be used to create access which is adaptable to what the user needs to look up at a specific moment (Müller-Spitzer 2008)? What are the limits of this user-independent and function-independent way of developing a dictionary?

Annette Klosa: /* Topic: Research into dictionary use and user-adaptive access (Instituut voor Nederlandse Lexicologie, Leiden) */

2012-10-04T06:24:31Z

Topic: Research into dictionary use and user-adaptive access (Instituut voor Nederlandse Lexicologie, Leiden)

← Nächstältere Version		Version vom 4. Oktober 2012, 06:24 Uhr
Zeile 1:		Zeile 1:
	[ [[5. Arbeitstreffen \| This page in German]] ]		[ [[5. Arbeitstreffen \| This page in German]] ]

	== Topic: Research into dictionary use and user-adaptive access (Instituut voor Nederlandse Lexicologie, Leiden)==		== Topic: Research into dictionary use and user-adaptive access (25th/26th March 2013, Instituut voor Nederlandse Lexicologie, Leiden)==

	In the field of traditional print lexicography, it has been claimed time and again that a dictionary must be designed for particular user groups and usage situations (Bergenholtz / Nielsen / Tarp 2009, Wiegand 2001), which is reflected for example in the choice of headwords or lexicographical description. In online dictionaries, the issue of the conceptional integration of user orientation arises in a new way: to what extent can users be defined solely by what they are looking up in the dictionary on a specific occasion? How can a non-user-specific lexicographical resource be used to create access which is adaptable to what the user needs to look up at a specific moment (Müller-Spitzer 2008)? What are the limits of this user-independent and function-independent way of developing a dictionary?		In the field of traditional print lexicography, it has been claimed time and again that a dictionary must be designed for particular user groups and usage situations (Bergenholtz / Nielsen / Tarp 2009, Wiegand 2001), which is reflected for example in the choice of headwords or lexicographical description. In online dictionaries, the issue of the conceptional integration of user orientation arises in a new way: to what extent can users be defined solely by what they are looking up in the dictionary on a specific occasion? How can a non-user-specific lexicographical resource be used to create access which is adaptable to what the user needs to look up at a specific moment (Müller-Spitzer 2008)? What are the limits of this user-independent and function-independent way of developing a dictionary?